![]() Running Cubase 12 on systems with hybrid-architecture CPUs can lead to audio dropouts and reduced performance.ĭisplay resolution minimum at 100% UI scaling Processors with hybrid-architecture design, such as 12th Gen Intel® Core™ or newer, are currently not supported on Windows operating systems. Intel® Core™ i5 (mid 2013 or later) or Apple silicon Intel® Core™ i5 (4th Generation) or AMD Ryzen™ MacOS Monterey, macOS Big Sur, macOS Ventura I don't think that's an issue with pretty much anyone else here.64-bit Windows 10 Version 21H2 (or higher), 64-bit Windows 11 Version 21H2 (or higher) The biggest leap for me was making my primary music machine a PC for the first time. I think if there were a MAC OS version of Sonar it would quickly put a serious dent in the Logic user base. If that's the case there should be no reason for me to use anything else.īottom line: you gotta use what works best for you - for me personally I have found the best fit in Sonar after years of Vision, Studio Vision Pro, Cubase, Logic and Pro-Tools. I believe Sonar reads/writes OMF files (but I have not done either yet). I'm lucky that my work for clients (such as they are) is all based on delivery of final music, and/or me engineering/producing sessions personally - so I found the need for Pro-Tools not what it once was prior to new faster CPU's that offer as much flexibility as the TDM modules. I like simple but powerful, and that's what makes Sonar so great, for me. ![]() It seemed just a little less stressful than Logic in it's complexity. There a couple things I'm figuring out, but Sonar is nowhere the headache that Logic and Pro-Tools were. The set-up and work flow is pretty straight ahead. My former studio partner has been using Nuendo for about five years, he's switching to Sonar and encouraged me to do so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |